First Lines
January 31, 2009
Books Bought:
- Rebecca by Daphne Du Maurier*
- David Copperfield by Charles Dickens
- Gone With The Wind by Margaret Mitchell*
- Inheritance of Loss by Kiran Desai
- Microtrends by Mark Penn
- The Historian by Elizabeth Kostova
*bought, but I already own a copy at home.
Books Read:
- Omnivore’s Dilemma by Michael Pollan
- The Complete Polysyllabic Spree by Nick Hornby
- Rebecca by Daphne Du Maurier
So I’m back from traipsing around beautiful Southeast Asia. Singapore has many charms including a stunning national orchid garden and a Borders bookstore. I wish I could have bought out Borders, but unfortunately the exchange rate + GST=no go. But I’m rather glad to be back here in my home away from home. It’s pretty chilly still so I’ve taken to grabbing books in the morning and heading over to a warm cafe to read for the afternoons. The less I turn on my heater (that doesn’t really do the job anyway), the smaller our monthly electric/gas bill, and the happier everyone is.
But I’m writing this post because I just reread Rebecca by Daphne Du Maurier today. What a great book. It’s so underhanded but a page-turner. But I think one of the best parts is the opening line because it captures so much of how the plot will resolve itself, “Last night I dreamt I went to Manderley again.” And then because I read that opening line, I thought about another famous opening line, “Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself.”
And that got me thinking, what makes a great first line? Why are those two so memorable? And I was going to some literary criticism search on it, but I don’t feel like asking the experts tonight. I think in the case of Mrs. Dalloway, it must have to do with how carefully chosen each word must be–because the story is such a short one. I can’t, at the moment, think of any other first lines that have always stuck with me.
The other great thing about Rebecca is the anonymous narrator. I feel like the Anonymous Narrator should get more appreciation as a character. I haven’t sat down to think about it systematically, but I wonder if the anonymous narrator is a period thing or geographic or universal. But there’s so much character building by choosing to leave out names–a sharp contrast to Jhumpa Lahiri’s point about names.
So yeah, I’m planning to read a lot more this year. I’m not quite sure why I rebought Gone With The Wind. I have the exact same copy/edition sitting on my bookshelf at home, and I have plenty of other things to read here. But I was feeling a little homesick, and I saw the red cover in the bookstore, and I had a strange craving to relive Scarlett O’Hara. Never thought I would identify myself so much with Atlanta, Georgia.
marking books
July 31, 2008
I’ve always tried to keep my books as clean as possible. No dogears, no bends, no wrinkles. But recently read this article.
now I understand…
July 30, 2008
Dostoevsky=genius. two months of trudging through Crime and Punishment was definitely worth it. The book is so rich. I just finished and feel like there’s already so much I missed and wish I had the time to go through certain passages and work out the imagery and symbolism. Luckily, my copy is a first-edition Norton Critical Edition so in the back there are lots of amazing criticism essays. I’m going to have to place this amongst one of the books I appreciate the most for quality.
“This was it: I wanted to make myself a Napoleon, and that is why I killed her…Now do you understand?”
multitasking
July 28, 2008
I’ve heard that girls are better at multitasking than boys.
I feel like that’s true.
I often like to read multiple books at once, alternating chapters of the books. I’m still reading in order (if you don’t know what that means, that’ll have to wait for another post when I explain how I read systematically) so I just make sure I finish the right book first.
Anyway, at the moment I’m still working on Crime and Punishment and The Mysterious Flame of Queen Loana. I’m pretty proud of myself because the first chapter in Mysterious Flame is titled “Cruelest Month,” and I immediately thought of T.S. Eliot’s The Wasteland…and it turns out the allusion in my mind was correct!
Mysterious Flame is another novel by the illustrious Umberto Eco. And by illustrious, I’m being literal because there are illustrations randomly throughout the book. I really like the concept. It’s about an old rare-book dealer in Milan who has suffered a loss of memory. But no worries, it bears no resemblance to Korean soap operas which also feature loss of memory quite frequently. No, the main character, can’t remember personal details of his life but he still has all his faculties and remembers every plot of every book he’s ever read and every line of poetry.
Lots of allusions in this book, obviously. But not in an annoying way.
trading spaces.
July 16, 2008
I’ve sort of been feeling like I live out of my suitcase ever since I went away to college, and it’s been a long time since I’ve had everything in my room neatly organized and put away, and, well, livable. The biggest problem, though, was the abduction and takeover of my room by books. Don’t believe me? Take a look at these pictures before I took the time to clean:
so finally I decided enough was enough and set about the monumental task of organizing my books. After buying two more bookshelves and throwing out some books I just knew I’d never even want to read a single word of again, I finally had enough shelf space to house my library.
I’m pretty pleased :]. If I ever have my own house, I hope I can have a room of just shelves for my books. According to my bookpedia (a super awesome program for macs that catalogs your books for you based on ISBN!), I’m at something like 470 books. That was kind of a self-satisfied post. But I’m kind of just really happy that I have my room back.






